BEWARE OF THE COMMUNIST POPULIST UPRISING.
Posted on September 3, 2006 at 07:00:08 PM by La Verdad (Le Truth)

They have been here for awhile disguising themselves among the Democratic Party. The Ex Democratic Party Chairman Solomon Ortiz Jr. knew this and expressed freely "I don't believe like my old man". Solomon jr. endorsed John Kelley as party chair. When John Kelley lost the race he blamed it on El Defenzor. He failed to realize that when it comes to the integrity of El Defenzor, it has wide and popular support both from liberals and moderates and even level-headed radicals as well. The reason: it has both a track history of truthfulness and internal gumption.
On the other hand, the mentioned group of Communists headed by John Kelley are being exposed by their own doing and by their own irrelevant platform.

Re(1): BEWARE OF THE COMMUNIST POPULIST UPRISING.
Posted on September 4, 2006 at 02:50:38 PM by Jesse

Great show today on 1440 keys.

I am not supporting any Ortizes
Posted on September 5, 2006 at 02:08:05 AM by Josie

The brilliant expose on the Corpus Christi Progresssive Populist Caucus clearly demonstrates no exaggeration was injected. The facts do speak for themselves. I have checked many a link, googled it, and found all the sources are true.

I refuse to be in denial and expect that action be take by my party leaders.

Re(1): I am not supporting any Ortizes
Posted on September 5, 2006 at 11:25:47 PM by Just The Facts

The Ortiz Dynasty need to come down. It will only perpetuate the corruption and frateralization with subverstionist communists. It has send our Democratic Party back many years.

Jr., instead of warning us, made a deal with them. He sold his soul, spoiled "red" brad.

"The public has a right to know
Posted on September 7, 2006 at 03:44:53 AM by Porter Goss -

Porter Goss - 01:55pm Aug 28, 2006 Central


Secret senator blocks bill, creating classic 'whodunit'
Something may be afoot as legislation that would provide database to track federal spending may never be voted on
WASHINGTON - In an ironic twist, legislation that would open up the murky world of government contracting to public scrutiny has been derailed by a secret parliamentary maneuver.

An unidentified senator placed a "secret hold" on legislation introduced by Sens. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., and Barack Obama, D-Ill., that would create a searchable database of government contracts, grants, insurance, loans and financial assistance, worth $2.5 trillion last year. The database would bring transparency to federal spending and be as simple to use as conducting a Google search.

The measure had been unanimously passed in a voice vote last month by the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee and had support from heavy hitters such as Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y. It was on the fast track for floor action before Congress recessed on Aug. 4 when someone put a hold on the measure.

Now the bill is in political limbo. Under senate rules, unless the senator who placed the hold decides to lift it, the bill will not be brought up for a vote.

"It really is outrageous to do this in the dead of night as Congress is recessing," said Gary Bass, executive director of OMB Watch, a budget watchdog group based in Washington. "The public has a right to know how the go

Porter Goss..Dem crusader,ladies and gentlemen..LOL
Posted on September 7, 2006 at 03:58:22 PM by Elwood Blues

LOL..trolling the waters over in this neck of the woods now,Porter? You'll probably have better luck here,as most everyone here is a Democrat.On the downside,though..only a few of them are up to speed on politics outside South Texas.

Oh..and btw..TWO senators placed a "secret hold" on the legislation..A Republican..Ted Stevens..and a Democrat..Robert Byrd..two of the biggest pork barrel spenders in Washington.

Since we both know that since Stevens is a "Repuke",then it's a given he's scum..but is Byrd scum,too..or does he get a free pass because he's a Dem?

Re(1): I am not supporting any Ortizes
Posted on September 5, 2006 at 10:58:19 AM by learn to espell

Good because Ortizes are not on the ballot. Ortiz's are

http://nuecespresidentialsuite.blogspot.com/2006/09/i-am-hoping-that-les-in-corpus-will-be.html
Posted on September 6, 2006 at 03:51:09 AM by Jaime Kenedeno

I wonder the History of the Inn's Presidential Suite.

Good Piece of Local Trivia?

Re(2):)supporting any Ortizes
Posted on September 5, 2006 at 08:56:55 PM by dannoynted1

why was a socialist running for nueces county democratic chair?

when he was/is not a democrat?

that is a dino!

i voted for mumphord!

Wrong . . .
Posted on September 5, 2006 at 04:18:35 PM by Grammar Fairy

. . . oh illiterate one. Ortiz's is the possessive case.

Re(1): Wrong . . .
Posted on September 5, 2006 at 08:58:37 PM by dannoynted1

or is it the progressive case?

hehehehe. Progressive cause or clause
Posted on September 5, 2006 at 11:20:48 PM by JVC

Comandante Vicente Clause.... hehehehe.