The Progressive Populist Socialists are now trying to control the main schedule of the N.C. Democratic Party

People's Forum? or Communist forum?
Posted on September 5, 2006 at 10:15:16 PM by Turned of by Democratic Party Decption

The Progressive Populist Socialists are now trying to control the main schedule of the N.C. Democratic Party. Why the People's forum (People's republic of Mao?)... Hey, we need to pull the weeds that have grown inside the yard of the Democratic Party. John Kelly ... Ortiz Jr. let them in. He has to be held accountable. He should have informed us instead of breaking bread with them.

Solly should rebuke the censorship of the STXC.....
Posted on September 6, 2006 at 02:40:26 AM by Jaime Kenedeno

he must rebuke these YANQUI Socialists as well.

Solly has made the committment to creating open government

The Ortiz "progressive" supporters demand and practice censorship. These kind of bad faith actions are losing this thing for Soli.

What are the "chismosos" afraid of?

Are they not the ones who claim to speak "truth to power"?

Are they not the ones who loathe DINOs?

These guys (WTP Soviet) are bad news for any circle in which they revolve.

Re(1): Solly should rebuke the censorship of the STXC.....
Posted on September 6, 2006 at 03:00:06 AM by herownself

What is sad about the John and Solly connection is that last year John was bad mouthing Solly to the nth degree. Now he acts as if they have always been bosom buddies. I hope Solly is aware of this and is protecting himself.

http://stxc.blogspot.com/2006/09/hd33-has-ortiz-mccomb-and-noyola.html

Sylvia Samniego of the Founder of PPC will be on KEYS in the Morning.
Posted on September 6, 2006 at 02:23:42 AM by Jaime Kenedeno

WATT did she know?

WATT does she know now?

Will she distance herself and the PPC from Comrade Kelly and the SPTX?

Certainly, one realizes this radio station is unamerican and "We the People" is not us, the people of South Texas.

This goes much deeper into our already established power structures.

The goal is to DISTRUCT our established groups and organizations. To do this they must infiltrate as posers of political parties, city and county governments. Even if they get a SPTX member elected to "Dog Catcher".

In their (SP TX) own words,

"If we want to build a party, we need to get some candidates elected, even if
it is only for dog catcher."

http://sp-usa.org/pipermail/sptxsc_sp-usa.org/2005-August/000385.html

In an article, What is Progressivism?

Populist Political Progressivism is defined:

"To distruct of concentrations of power in the hands of politicians, corporations, elite families and special interst groups as represented by political and conservative political action committees, lobbies, or think tanks."
*WTP June 5, 2006 (no author).

The SPTX works it's way into established groups of people ie; Organizations, Clubs, Labor Unions and any who might be vulnerable. Thirsty souls will drink from the well, it does not matter who's well it is. Same goes for poor, disenfranchised and the ones who need the alliance for expediency. Once dependence matures, the distruction begins.

SPTX Counter Recruitment: NYU and the University of Texas-Pan American (UTPA).
Posted on September 7, 2006 at 02:01:47 AM by Suson@DoD

Student Protest Prevents CIA Recruiting Rvent at New York University

-Press Release by Elizabeth Wrigley-Field and Sam Pipp

A planned CIA recruiting event at New York University (NYU) was cancelled after the Campus Antiwar Network (CAN) called a protest demanding the CIA abandon its recruiting program at NYU. 20 hours before the recruiting event was scheduled to begin, its organizers sent an email to all those who had registered, headlined, "The CIA Speaker Event scheduled for Thursday, March 31 @6PM has been CANCELLED due to the possibility of a protest by the Campus Antiwar Network."

The event -- which was scheduled to include speakers from the CIA, a dinner, and a raffle for prizes such as an iPod Shuffle -- was organized by students in an NYU marketing class whose classwork for the semester is to market the CIA to their peers at NYU. They will be graded on their efforts; the CIA, which provided them a $2500 budget for their project, retains ownership of the marketing campaign they create. The CIA hired the company EdVenture Partners to broker this arrangement.

This alliance between the university and the CIA to market CIA employment on campus is taking place at only two universities this semester: NYU and the University of Texas-Pan American (UTPA). Students at both schools have rallied in protest against the program.

"We believe they're testing the waters to see how brazenly they can recruit on campuses without encountering student opposition, before spreading programs like this to colleges across the country," said Elizabeth Wrigley-Field, a senior at NYU and member of the Campus Antiwar Network. "Forcing them to cancel their big speaking event is a huge victory. It showed them they can't market an agency that supports torture and murder around the world without a fight."

After the event was cancelled, about twenty students rallied in celebration outside the building where it was scheduled to have been held, passing out fact sheets about the CIA's history of assassination attempts and support for brutal dictatorships. Ten students went to challenge the event's organizers to a public debate on campus about the CIA -- an offer which was declined.

"Their marketing campaign says they want to 'dispel the myths' about the CIA," said David Florey, a senior at NYU and member of the Campus Antiwar Network. "But they refused our offer to debate. They can't dispel the reality of the CIA's own practices. It's not a myth that the CIA organized the program in Afghanistan that trained Osama bin Laden."

PART OF A NATIONAL COUNTER-RECRUITMENT MOVEMENT

NYU's protest comes in the context of a counter-recruitment movement that has swept colleges and high schools across the country. Students at schools ranging from Seattle Central Community College and San Francisco State University on the West Coast, to City College New York and and Southern Connecticut State University on the East Coast, have chased military recruiters off their campus this schoolyear.

Expensive private colleges like NYU don't get the same kinds of military recruiters. The only recruiters NYU has seen this year came from the Judge Advocate General (the legal arm of the military), which faced protest from NYU students opposed to the discriminatory Don't Ask, Don't Tell and the prosecution of war resisters. But students at NYU see their CIA Off Campus campaign as a contribution to the national counter-recruitment movement.

"We know that because of the general affluence of the students at NYU, direct military recruitment will never be as fruitful as the government would hope, but in the past few months, we've seen a significant increase in the presence of OTHER forms of recruitment for militaristic operations," said Sam Pipp, a sophomore at NYU and member of the Campus Antiwar Network. "This CIA recruitment in the guise of a class represents a campaign of sorts on the part of the government to pull as many as they can into the military machine."

"We're here as part of a growing counter-recruitment movement that has the potential to stop Bush's ability to carry out his agenda of war and terror," said Leia Petty, a member of the Campus Antiwar Network, at the protest. "We're here to say that torture and terror are not career opportunities, and we don't intend to back down until the CIA drops all efforts to recruit at NYU."

THIS PROTEST IS JUST THE BEGINNING

Two days before NYU's protest, students at UTPA had protested the CIA recruiting event at their campus, where the CIA is explicitly marketing itself as an employer of choice for Latinos. "I think the students in the marketing class are naive to think they're offering any opportunity to Hispanics," said Samantha Garcia, president of Students for Peace and Justice and the University Socialist Forum at UTPA, two groups that protested the CIA. Garcia noted the CIA's history of involvement in Latin America, such as its involvement in the overthrow of Chile's left-wing leader Salvador Allende and its support of Nicaragua's Contras.

At both schools, students plan to keep fighting the CIA presence and opposing the U.S. occupation in Iraq, which they see as intimately connected. "Bush says we're bringing democracy to Iraq," Wrigley-Field said. "But the history of the CIA shows the U.S. is the last country that can bring democracy anywhere."

Re(1): People's Forum? or Communist forum?
Posted on September 5, 2006 at 11:28:10 PM by Want Entire List- Progressive Socialists

I want to know who they all are. We need to investigate them all. WE NEED TO KNOW IF THEY HAVE BEEN ATTENDING COMMUNIST MEETING... if so they need to be reported, and ousted from our party.

Re(2): People's Forum? or Communist forum?
Posted on September 7, 2006 at 03:44:04 PM by Elwood Blues

Isn't it ironic that the same people who are wetting themselves over the perception that "communism" has reared it's ugly head within the South Texas Democratic Party,are..by and large..the same people who "long for the return of Aztlan"?

Think about it..the definition of communism is:

"A theory or system of social organization based on the holding of all property in common,actual ownership being ascribed to the community as a whole or to the state"...or..

"A system of social organization in which all economic and social activity is controlled by a totalitarian state dominated by a single and self-perpetuating political party".

Now..from what I've seen of the Aztlan crowd..it seems to me that a form of COMMUNISM is what they aspire to.A society wherin the people,as a whole, hold the wealth..wherein all businesses are owned by the people,as a whole,..all property is owned by the people,as a whole.

A system of government that eschews capitalism,the free market and free enterprise,where individuals themselves do not own property and land..instead,everything is owned collectively by the people themselves..that land,businesses and property are to be seized and "returned" to the people..isn't that the economic premise of Aztlan?

That,my friends..by definition..is communism..and from what I've read both here,and from other sources on the proponents of Aztlan,communism is what they aspire to.

That being said,I find it both surprising and mildly amusing that there are people are outraged over the notion that communism may be infiltrating area Democratic politics.Personally,I have no dog in this fight..I wouldn't vote for either Noyola OR Son of Sol on a bet,and I suspect the charges being leveled here against Son of Sol have more to do with sour grapes on the part of Noyola supporters,seeing as he lost the Dem nomination to Son of Sol,than any tangible proof he's a communist,but hey..whatever works.If tagging Son of Sol a communist is what it'll take to get his worthless,scumbag old man finally voted out of Congress in November,then by all means..knock yourselves out.Call him Lenin,compare him to Mao,say he's related to Castro for all I care..as long as it sends his old man packing in the process.

Hell..I'll even start a "chisme" for you Son of Sol haters..I heard from a friend of a friend of a guy who mows Son of Sol's next door neighbor's yard,that Sol Jr. has a commie flag hanging in his garage,and that he's thiking of naming his firstborn son "Karl Marx Ortiz".

Culture of Aztlan and Communism not same
Posted on September 9, 2006 at 08:05:24 PM by Maggie

Being proud of one's native american culture is not communism. You way our there. If there are Aztlanos, who want to break from this country. It is not what I or those I know condone. We are not stupid to believe that we can win any war against ourselves.
EB, keep in mind that a few years ago, Mexican americans were denied their native american heritage by catholic schools as well as public. We used to get slapped on the mouth etc. It is pride to be part of the first americans. You just don't know.

Re(3): People's Forum? or Communist forum?
Posted on September 7, 2006 at 05:21:17 PM by dannoynted1

insightful as usual eb

Re(2): People's Forum? or Communist forum?
Posted on September 7, 2006 at 00:13:07 AM by All Commies!

YeS!
The Defenzor! has finally done it!
Thankyou for Stoping the Red Army!

Hahahaaa How much are they paying you to keep up this JOKE! hahaha you guys are pathetic!

Re(3): People's Forum? or Communist forum?
Posted on September 7, 2006 at 02:59:02 AM by Solly's cousin

It disturbs me how much influence John has over my cousin. I warned him. To this day his eyes light up when John contact him.
What is wrong with him?

Re(4): People's Forum? or Communist forum?
Posted on September 7, 2006 at 03:20:29 AM by aggie

it must be the "one mind at a time" chyme or shyme!

Must be working......
Posted on September 7, 2006 at 01:16:11 AM by Jaime Kenedeno

on "One Mind At A Time".

If it was not a big deal then why didnt the CCPPC proudly announce their affiliation with the Socialist Party of Texas. Why not invite everyone to attend the Socialist Party Convention held at the Ramada Inn, 600 Water Street, Corpus Christi, Tx? The same place where Comrade Kelley now broadcasts from.

Kelley admitted Socialist Party of Texas Loyalist committed fraud upon the people of South Texas and the Nueces Democratic Party. He also lied on an election instrument so as to run as a Democrat. Tampering with Government Documents. This is subversion of Government and Election Fraud.